Anyway, they announced the winners here. Congratulations to some of them, they deserved it. However, I don't agree with the judges' decision on who should have won.
Top Five Winners

It seems that the judges, coming from various ad agencies, chose to ignore the contest mechanics and followed their own criteria. The official mechanics stated:CRITERIA for JUDGINGLooking at the photos above and at the other entries; and then judging based on the criteria indicated, I would say there are others, more deserving to win. It seems that the winning entries are chosen based on their suitability for an ad campaign! Yeah, they are great shots. Any photography addict with the proper equipment can make that. But some of them have less humor, wittiness, or entertainment than the non-winning entries.
CREATIVITY(50%) - Based on the Uniqueness and/or Originality, Overall Impact, Composition, Subject rendered, and Artistic Merit.
HUMOR (40%) Wholesomeness, wittiness and/or Entertaining
CLARITY/QUALITY OF PHOTO (10%) Quality and Sharpness of color and texture
Decisions made by the Judges are irrevocable. CHOWKING will select top 5 photos. All the top 5 winners will get ACER ASPIRE LAPTOP CONSOLATION PRIZE: 10 winners of P5,000 worth of Chowking gift certificates. Prizes are Transferable but not convertible to cash.
If you were to ask me who should win, these are my choices:
Top Five
Chowking should be thankful that Hen Lin, their main competitor, is years away in equaling them in size. Otherwise, these problems will slowly eat them out of the market.
In my opinion, they're all mediocre.
ReplyDeletein my opinion, i think they are all deserving. with the technical problems, they're partner i think was YEHEY.com (carp!),kaya pala. haha
ReplyDeleteIn my opinion..hmnn..wala..walang kwenta hahaha
ReplyDelete